What are the chances of seeing a Pied Bushchat in Chitwan National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Bushchat sighting in Chitwan National Park on a given day, based on 747 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 35th most-seen of the 367 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pied Bushchat in Chitwan National Park?
February
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Bushchat in Chitwan National Park on a given day, against about 20% in August and September, the lowest months. That is one of Chitwan National Park's driest months, with about 30 mm of rain against 660 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Pied Bushchat?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pied Bushchat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chitwan National Park the best place to see a Pied Bushchat?
5th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Pied Bushchat sightings, Chitwan National Park ranks 5th at about 40%. The best odds are in Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 90%), Eravikulam National Park (India, about 70%) and Keoladeo National Park (India, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pied Bushchat live in Chitwan National Park?
Same genus: Saxicola
The closest relatives of the Pied Bushchat that you can see in Chitwan National Park (genus Saxicola, Stonechats and Bushchats) are Siberian Stonechat (about 40%) and White-tailed Stonechat (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pied Bushchat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pied Bushchat is recorded against all the birds logged in Chitwan National Park (747 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.