What are the chances of seeing a Chalk-browed Mockingbird in Campo Grande?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Chalk-browed Mockingbird sighting in Campo Grande on a given day, based on 155 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 65th most-seen of the 221 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chalk-browed Mockingbird in Campo Grande?
December
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Chalk-browed Mockingbird in Campo Grande on a given day, against about 10% in March, June–July and November, the lowest months. That is one of Campo Grande's wettest months, with about 180 mm of rain against 30 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Chalk-browed Mockingbird?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chalk-browed Mockingbird sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Campo Grande the best place to see a Chalk-browed Mockingbird?
14th of 24
Of the 24 cities where we can rate Chalk-browed Mockingbird sightings, Campo Grande ranks 14th at about 20%. The best odds are in Rosario (Argentina, about 80%), Buenos Aires (Argentina, about 80%) and Brasilia (Brazil, about 80%).
Which relatives of the Chalk-browed Mockingbird live in Campo Grande?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Chalk-browed Mockingbird that you can see in Campo Grande (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Great Kiskadee (about 90%), Rufous Hornero (about 80%) and Rufous-bellied Thrush (about 80%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chalk-browed Mockingbird sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chalk-browed Mockingbird is recorded against all the birds logged in Campo Grande (155 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.