What are the chances of seeing an Amazonian Motmot in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Amazonian Motmot sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 56 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 122nd most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Amazonian Motmot in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
October
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Amazonian Motmot in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in January–April and June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Amazonian Motmot?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Amazonian Motmot sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see an Amazonian Motmot?
7th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Amazonian Motmot sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 7th at about 10%. The best odds are in Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 40%), Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 30%) and Sierra de la Macarena National Park (Colombia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Amazonian Motmot live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same order: Coraciiformes
The closest relatives of the Amazonian Motmot that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (order Coraciiformes, Rollers, Kingfishers, and Allies) are Ringed Kingfisher (about 60%), Amazon Kingfisher (about 60%) and Green Kingfisher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Amazonian Motmot sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Amazonian Motmot is recorded against all the birds logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (56 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.