What are the chances of seeing a Periander Metalmark in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Periander Metalmark sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 20th most-seen of the 45 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Periander Metalmark in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
May and December
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Periander Metalmark in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in January–March, June–August and October–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Periander Metalmark?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Periander Metalmark sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see a Periander Metalmark?
7th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Periander Metalmark sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 7th at about 20%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 30%), Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Manu National Park (Peru, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Periander Metalmark live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same family: Riodinidae
The closest relatives of the Periander Metalmark that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (family Riodinidae, Metalmark Butterflies) are Lysippus Metalmark (about 30%) and Stalachtis euterpe (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Periander Metalmark sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Periander Metalmark is recorded against all the insects logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.