What are the chances of seeing an Orange Daggerwing in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an Orange Daggerwing sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 20th most-seen of the 45 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Orange Daggerwing in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
June
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report an Orange Daggerwing in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in April and August–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Orange Daggerwing?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Orange Daggerwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see an Orange Daggerwing?
4th of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Orange Daggerwing sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 4th at about 20%. The best odds are in Tayrona National Natural Park (Colombia, about 30%), Corcovado National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Darién National Park (Panama, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Orange Daggerwing live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same genus: Marpesia
The closest relatives of the Orange Daggerwing that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (genus Marpesia, Daggerwings) are Many-Banded Daggerwing (about 30%), Crethon Daggerwing (about 30%) and Ruddy Daggerwing (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Orange Daggerwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Orange Daggerwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.