What are the chances of seeing a Many-Banded Daggerwing in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Many-Banded Daggerwing sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 27 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 4th most-seen of the 45 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Many-Banded Daggerwing in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
May and October
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Many-Banded Daggerwing in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in April and December–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Many-Banded Daggerwing?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Many-Banded Daggerwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see a Many-Banded Daggerwing?
Among the best
Of the 26 parks where we can rate Many-Banded Daggerwing sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 2nd at about 30%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Many-Banded Daggerwing live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same genus: Marpesia
The closest relatives of the Many-Banded Daggerwing that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (genus Marpesia, Daggerwings) are Crethon Daggerwing (about 30%), Ruddy Daggerwing (about 20%) and Orange Daggerwing (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Many-Banded Daggerwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Many-Banded Daggerwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (27 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.