What are the chances of seeing a Swainson's Flycatcher in El Palmar National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Swainson's Flycatcher sighting in El Palmar National Park on a given day, based on 32 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 101st most-seen of the 151 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Swainson's Flycatcher in El Palmar National Park?
February and November–December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Swainson's Flycatcher in El Palmar National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March to September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Swainson's Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Swainson's Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is El Palmar National Park the best place to see a Swainson's Flycatcher?
3rd of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Swainson's Flycatcher sightings, El Palmar National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 20%) and El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Swainson's Flycatcher live in El Palmar National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Swainson's Flycatcher that you can see in El Palmar National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Cattle Tyrant (about 60%), Great Kiskadee (about 50%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Swainson's Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Swainson's Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in El Palmar National Park (32 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.