What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-bellied Eagle in Eravikulam National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-bellied Eagle sighting in Eravikulam National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 104th most-seen of the 116 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-bellied Eagle in Eravikulam National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-bellied Eagle in Eravikulam National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-bellied Eagle?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-bellied Eagle sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Eravikulam National Park the best place to see a Rufous-bellied Eagle?
17th of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Rufous-bellied Eagle sightings, Eravikulam National Park ranks 17th at under 5%. The best odds are in Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan, about 10%), Periyar National Park (India, about 10%) and Kerinci Seblat National Park (Indonesia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Rufous-bellied Eagle live in Eravikulam National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Rufous-bellied Eagle that you can see in Eravikulam National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Black Eagle (about 20%), Bonelli's Eagle (about 10%) and Crested Serpent Eagle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-bellied Eagle sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-bellied Eagle is recorded against all the birds logged in Eravikulam National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.