What are the chances of seeing a Torrent Tyrannulet in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Torrent Tyrannulet sighting in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, based on 603 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 83rd most-seen of the 542 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Torrent Tyrannulet in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
August, October and December–May
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Torrent Tyrannulet in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park on a given day, against about 10% in June–July, September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Torrent Tyrannulet?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Torrent Tyrannulet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Farallones de Cali National Natural Park the best place to see a Torrent Tyrannulet?
2nd of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Torrent Tyrannulet sightings, Farallones de Cali National Natural Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Los Quetzales National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Torrent Tyrannulet live in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Torrent Tyrannulet that you can see in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Golden-faced Tyrannulet (about 50%), Common Tody-Flycatcher (about 50%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Torrent Tyrannulet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Torrent Tyrannulet is recorded against all the birds logged in Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (603 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.