What are the chances of seeing a Mouse-Coloured Tyrannulet in Henri Pittier National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Mouse-Coloured Tyrannulet sighting in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, based on 30 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 222nd most-seen of the 358 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Mouse-Coloured Tyrannulet in Henri Pittier National Park?
April
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Mouse-Coloured Tyrannulet in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and May–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Mouse-Coloured Tyrannulet?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Mouse-Coloured Tyrannulet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Henri Pittier National Park the best place to see a Mouse-Coloured Tyrannulet?
3rd of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Mouse-Coloured Tyrannulet sightings, Henri Pittier National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Anavilhanas National Park (Brazil, about 10%) and Chapada dos Guimarães National Park (Brazil, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Mouse-Coloured Tyrannulet live in Henri Pittier National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Mouse-Coloured Tyrannulet that you can see in Henri Pittier National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 40%), Tropical Kingbird (about 40%) and Social Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Mouse-Coloured Tyrannulet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Mouse-Coloured Tyrannulet is recorded against all the birds logged in Henri Pittier National Park (30 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.