What are the chances of seeing a Flame-crested Tanager in Itatiaia National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Flame-crested Tanager sighting in Itatiaia National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 343rd most-seen of the 352 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Flame-crested Tanager in Itatiaia National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Flame-crested Tanager in Itatiaia National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Flame-crested Tanager?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Flame-crested Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Itatiaia National Park the best place to see a Flame-crested Tanager?
12th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Flame-crested Tanager sightings, Itatiaia National Park ranks 12th at under 5%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 40%), Tijuca National Park (Brazil, about 10%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Flame-crested Tanager live in Itatiaia National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Flame-crested Tanager that you can see in Itatiaia National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Saffron Finch (about 60%), Sayaca Tanager (about 60%) and Green-winged Saltator (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Flame-crested Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Flame-crested Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Itatiaia National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.