What are the chances of seeing a Black-faced Woodswallow in Kakadu National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Woodswallow sighting in Kakadu National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 182nd most-seen of the 186 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-faced Woodswallow in Kakadu National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Woodswallow in Kakadu National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. February has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Black-faced Woodswallow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-faced Woodswallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kakadu National Park the best place to see a Black-faced Woodswallow?
6th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Black-faced Woodswallow sightings, Kakadu National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (Australia, about 40%), Cape Range (Australia, about 10%) and Nitmiluk National Park (Australia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Black-faced Woodswallow live in Kakadu National Park?
Same genus: Artamus
The closest relatives of the Black-faced Woodswallow that you can see in Kakadu National Park (genus Artamus, Woodswallows) are Little Woodswallow (about 10%) and White-breasted Woodswallow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-faced Woodswallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-faced Woodswallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Kakadu National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.