What are the chances of seeing a Pale-billed Flowerpecker in Kanha National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pale-billed Flowerpecker sighting in Kanha National Park on a given day, based on 469 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 118th most-seen of the 286 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pale-billed Flowerpecker in Kanha National Park?
June, August and October–April
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pale-billed Flowerpecker in Kanha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May, July and September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pale-billed Flowerpecker?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pale-billed Flowerpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kanha National Park the best place to see a Pale-billed Flowerpecker?
14th of 18
Of the 18 parks where we can rate Pale-billed Flowerpecker sightings, Kanha National Park ranks 14th at about 10%. The best odds are in Sinharaja Forest Reserve (Sri Lanka, about 60%), Horton Plains National Park (Sri Lanka, about 60%) and Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pale-billed Flowerpecker live in Kanha National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Pale-billed Flowerpecker that you can see in Kanha National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Rufous Treepie (about 70%), Black-hooded Oriole (about 70%) and Black Drongo (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pale-billed Flowerpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pale-billed Flowerpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Kanha National Park (469 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.