What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-bellied Eagle in Khao Luang National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-bellied Eagle sighting in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 166th most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-bellied Eagle in Khao Luang National Park?
January
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-bellied Eagle in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March to December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-bellied Eagle?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-bellied Eagle sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Khao Luang National Park the best place to see a Rufous-bellied Eagle?
12th of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Rufous-bellied Eagle sightings, Khao Luang National Park ranks 12th at under 5%. The best odds are in Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan, about 10%), Periyar National Park (India, about 10%) and Kerinci Seblat National Park (Indonesia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Rufous-bellied Eagle live in Khao Luang National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Rufous-bellied Eagle that you can see in Khao Luang National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Crested Serpent Eagle (about 30%), Oriental Honey-buzzard (about 20%) and Blyth's Hawk-Eagle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-bellied Eagle sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-bellied Eagle is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Luang National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.