What are the chances of seeing a Red-necked Phalarope in Kluane National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-necked Phalarope sighting in Kluane National Park on a given day, based on 31 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 74th most-seen of the 129 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-necked Phalarope in Kluane National Park?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Red-necked Phalarope in Kluane National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and September–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Red-necked Phalarope?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-necked Phalarope sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kluane National Park the best place to see a Red-necked Phalarope?
7th of 28
Of the 28 parks where we can rate Red-necked Phalarope sightings, Kluane National Park ranks 7th at about 10%. The best odds are in Komodo National Park (Indonesia, about 20%), Vatnajokull National Park (Iceland, about 20%) and Kenai Fjords National Park (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Red-necked Phalarope live in Kluane National Park?
Same family: Scolopacidae
The closest relatives of the Red-necked Phalarope that you can see in Kluane National Park (family Scolopacidae, Sandpipers and Allies) are Wilson's Snipe (about 20%), Spotted Sandpiper (about 20%) and Lesser Yellowlegs (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-necked Phalarope sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-necked Phalarope is recorded against all the birds logged in Kluane National Park (31 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.