What are the chances of seeing an Olive-backed Oriole in Kosciuszko National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Olive-backed Oriole sighting in Kosciuszko National Park on a given day, based on 34 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 65th most-seen of the 127 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Olive-backed Oriole in Kosciuszko National Park?
December
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Olive-backed Oriole in Kosciuszko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–May and July–August, the lowest months. June has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Olive-backed Oriole?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Olive-backed Oriole sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kosciuszko National Park the best place to see an Olive-backed Oriole?
6th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Olive-backed Oriole sightings, Kosciuszko National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Nitmiluk National Park (Australia, about 30%), Royal National Park (Australia, about 20%) and Noosa National Park (Australia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Olive-backed Oriole live in Kosciuszko National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Olive-backed Oriole that you can see in Kosciuszko National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Pied Currawong (about 70%), Yellow-faced Honeyeater (about 70%) and Superb Fairywren (about 70%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Olive-backed Oriole sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Olive-backed Oriole is recorded against all the birds logged in Kosciuszko National Park (34 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.