What are the chances of seeing a Wandering Percher in Litchfield National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Wandering Percher sighting in Litchfield National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 29th most-seen of the 43 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Wandering Percher in Litchfield National Park?
February
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Wandering Percher in Litchfield National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and August–January, the lowest months. That is one of Litchfield National Park's wettest months, with about 340 mm of rain against almost none in July.
What time of day is best to see a Wandering Percher?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Wandering Percher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Litchfield National Park the best place to see a Wandering Percher?
5th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Wandering Percher sightings, Litchfield National Park ranks 5th at about 20%. The best odds are in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (Australia, about 30%), Grampians National Park (Australia, about 30%) and Kakadu National Park (Australia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Wandering Percher live in Litchfield National Park?
Same genus: Diplacodes
The closest relatives of the Wandering Percher that you can see in Litchfield National Park (genus Diplacodes, Perchers) are Chalky Percher (about 40%) and Scarlet Percher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Wandering Percher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Wandering Percher is recorded against all the insects logged in Litchfield National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.