What are the chances of seeing a Golden-crowned Spadebill in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-crowned Spadebill sighting in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 299th most-seen of the 325 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Golden-crowned Spadebill in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-crowned Spadebill in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Golden-crowned Spadebill?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Golden-crowned Spadebill sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manuel Antonio National Park the best place to see a Golden-crowned Spadebill?
13th of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Golden-crowned Spadebill sightings, Manuel Antonio National Park ranks 13th at under 5%. The best odds are in Corcovado National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%), Darién National Park (Panama, about 20%) and Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Golden-crowned Spadebill live in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Golden-crowned Spadebill that you can see in Manuel Antonio National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 70%), Tropical Kingbird (about 60%) and Boat-billed Flycatcher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Golden-crowned Spadebill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Golden-crowned Spadebill is recorded against all the birds logged in Manuel Antonio National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.