What are the chances of seeing a Cinereous Vulture in Pyrénées National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Cinereous Vulture sighting in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, based on 50 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 129th most-seen of the 174 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cinereous Vulture in Pyrénées National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Cinereous Vulture in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Cinereous Vulture?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cinereous Vulture sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pyrénées National Park the best place to see a Cinereous Vulture?
9th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Cinereous Vulture sightings, Pyrénées National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Monfragüe National Park (Spain, about 60%), Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park (Mongolia, about 40%) and Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Cinereous Vulture live in Pyrénées National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Cinereous Vulture that you can see in Pyrénées National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Griffon Vulture (about 70%), Red Kite (about 40%) and Common Buzzard (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cinereous Vulture sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cinereous Vulture is recorded against all the birds logged in Pyrénées National Park (50 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.