What are the chances of seeing a Lineated Barbet in Royal Manas National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lineated Barbet sighting in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, based on 125 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 126th most-seen of the 388 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lineated Barbet in Royal Manas National Park?
February, June and October–November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Lineated Barbet in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May, the lowest month. August and September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Lineated Barbet?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lineated Barbet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Royal Manas National Park the best place to see a Lineated Barbet?
11th of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Lineated Barbet sightings, Royal Manas National Park ranks 11th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kaziranga National Park (India, about 50%), Manas National Park (India, about 40%) and Bali Barat National Park (Indonesia, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Lineated Barbet live in Royal Manas National Park?
Same genus: Psilopogon
The closest relatives of the Lineated Barbet that you can see in Royal Manas National Park (genus Psilopogon, Typical Asian Barbets) are Blue-throated Barbet (about 70%), Great Barbet (about 50%) and Golden-throated Barbet (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lineated Barbet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lineated Barbet is recorded against all the birds logged in Royal Manas National Park (125 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.