What are the chances of seeing a Pale Harrier in Ruaha National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Pale Harrier sighting in Ruaha National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 260th most-seen of the 276 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pale Harrier in Ruaha National Park?
January and April
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pale Harrier in Ruaha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and May–December, the lowest months. Those are among Ruaha National Park's wettest months, with about 140 mm of rain a month against almost none in June.
What time of day is best to see a Pale Harrier?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pale Harrier sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ruaha National Park the best place to see a Pale Harrier?
14th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Pale Harrier sightings, Ruaha National Park ranks 14th at under 5%. The best odds are in Masai Mara National Reserve (Kenya, about 10%), Bale Mountains National Park (Ethiopia, about 10%) and Serengeti National Park (Tanzania, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Pale Harrier live in Ruaha National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Pale Harrier that you can see in Ruaha National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Bateleur (about 60%), African Fish-Eagle (about 50%) and Tawny Eagle (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pale Harrier sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pale Harrier is recorded against all the birds logged in Ruaha National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.