What are the chances of seeing a Red-headed Weaver in Serengeti National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-headed Weaver sighting in Serengeti National Park on a given day, based on 281 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 168th most-seen of the 469 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-headed Weaver in Serengeti National Park?
July
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Red-headed Weaver in Serengeti National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and September, the lowest months. That is one of Serengeti National Park's driest months, with about 5 mm of rain against 140 mm in April.
What time of day is best to see a Red-headed Weaver?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-headed Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serengeti National Park the best place to see a Red-headed Weaver?
17th of 34
Of the 34 parks where we can rate Red-headed Weaver sightings, Serengeti National Park ranks 17th at about 10%. The best odds are in Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 30%), Ruaha National Park (Tanzania, about 30%) and Meru National Park (Kenya, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Red-headed Weaver live in Serengeti National Park?
Same family: Ploceidae
The closest relatives of the Red-headed Weaver that you can see in Serengeti National Park (family Ploceidae, Weavers and Allies) are White-headed Buffalo-Weaver (about 40%), Speckle-fronted Weaver (about 40%) and Red-billed Buffalo-Weaver (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-headed Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-headed Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Serengeti National Park (281 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.