What are the chances of seeing a Sibine nesea in Tayrona National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Sibine nesea sighting in Tayrona National Natural Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 28th most-seen of the 32 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sibine nesea in Tayrona National Natural Park?
February
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Sibine nesea in Tayrona National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, March and May–November, the lowest months. That is one of Tayrona National Natural Park's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain against 180 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Sibine nesea?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sibine nesea sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Tayrona National Natural Park the best place to see a Sibine nesea?
3rd of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Sibine nesea sightings, Tayrona National Natural Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 20%) and Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Sibine nesea live in Tayrona National Natural Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Sibine nesea that you can see in Tayrona National Natural Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Red Peacock (about 40%), Red Postman (about 30%) and Common Morpho (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sibine nesea sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sibine nesea is recorded against all the insects logged in Tayrona National Natural Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.