What are the chances of seeing a Walker's Moth in Tijuca National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Walker's Moth sighting in Tijuca National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 76th most-seen of the 132 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Walker's Moth in Tijuca National Park?
March–May, July and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Walker's Moth in Tijuca National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June, August–September and November–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Walker's Moth?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Walker's Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Tijuca National Park the best place to see a Walker's Moth?
13th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Walker's Moth sightings, Tijuca National Park ranks 13th at about 10%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 40%), Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%) and Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Walker's Moth live in Tijuca National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Walker's Moth that you can see in Tijuca National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Black Witch (about 10%), Poecilosoma eone (about 10%) and Leucotmemis nexa (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Walker's Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Walker's Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Tijuca National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.