What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Motmot in Utría National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Motmot sighting in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 92nd most-seen of the 154 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Motmot in Utría National Natural Park?
February and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Motmot in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in September, the lowest month. April, June and December have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Motmot?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Motmot sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Utría National Natural Park the best place to see a Rufous Motmot?
8th of 20
Of the 20 parks where we can rate Rufous Motmot sightings, Utría National Natural Park ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Chagres National Park (Panama, about 30%), Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 30%) and Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Rufous Motmot live in Utría National Natural Park?
Same order: Coraciiformes
The closest relatives of the Rufous Motmot that you can see in Utría National Natural Park (order Coraciiformes, Rollers, Kingfishers, and Allies) are Ringed Kingfisher (about 40%), Green Kingfisher (about 10%) and Amazon Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Motmot sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Motmot is recorded against all the birds logged in Utría National Natural Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.