What are the chances of seeing a Torrent Tyrannulet in Volcán Barú National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Torrent Tyrannulet sighting in Volcán Barú National Park on a given day, based on 115 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 124th most-seen of the 296 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Torrent Tyrannulet in Volcán Barú National Park?
August
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Torrent Tyrannulet in Volcán Barú National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, April and July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Torrent Tyrannulet?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Torrent Tyrannulet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Volcán Barú National Park the best place to see a Torrent Tyrannulet?
3rd of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Torrent Tyrannulet sightings, Volcán Barú National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Los Quetzales National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%) and Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Torrent Tyrannulet live in Volcán Barú National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Torrent Tyrannulet that you can see in Volcán Barú National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Mountain Elaenia (about 50%), Tufted Flycatcher (about 40%) and Yellowish Flycatcher (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Torrent Tyrannulet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Torrent Tyrannulet is recorded against all the birds logged in Volcán Barú National Park (115 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.