What are the chances of seeing a Green-and-rufous Kingfisher in Yasuní National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Green-and-rufous Kingfisher sighting in Yasuní National Park on a given day, based on 640 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 82nd most-seen of the 533 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Green-and-rufous Kingfisher in Yasuní National Park?
September
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Green-and-rufous Kingfisher in Yasuní National Park on a given day, against about 10% in May, July and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Green-and-rufous Kingfisher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Green-and-rufous Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Yasuní National Park the best place to see a Green-and-rufous Kingfisher?
2nd of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Green-and-rufous Kingfisher sightings, Yasuní National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Green-and-rufous Kingfisher live in Yasuní National Park?
Same genus: Chloroceryle
The closest relatives of the Green-and-rufous Kingfisher that you can see in Yasuní National Park (genus Chloroceryle, American Green Kingfishers) are American Pygmy Kingfisher (about 20%), Green Kingfisher (about 20%) and Amazon Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Green-and-rufous Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Green-and-rufous Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Yasuní National Park (640 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.