What are the chances of seeing a Ghost Anole in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Ghost Anole sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 27 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 28th most-seen of the 57 reptiles we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Ghost Anole in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
August
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Ghost Anole in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Ghost Anole?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ghost Anole sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Braulio Carrillo National Park the best place to see a Ghost Anole?
10th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Ghost Anole sightings, Braulio Carrillo National Park ranks 10th at about 20%. The best odds are in Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 60%), Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (Honduras, about 40%) and Cusuco National Park (Honduras, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ghost Anole live in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Same genus: Anolis
The closest relatives of the Ghost Anole that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (genus Anolis, Anoles) are Border Anole (about 60%), Humble Anole (about 40%) and Neotropical Green Anole (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ghost Anole sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ghost Anole is recorded against all the reptiles logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (27 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.