What are the chances of seeing a Torrent Tyrannulet in Chirripó National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Torrent Tyrannulet sighting in Chirripó National Park on a given day, based on 106 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 147th most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Torrent Tyrannulet in Chirripó National Park?
April–May, July and November–February
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Torrent Tyrannulet in Chirripó National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, June and August–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Torrent Tyrannulet?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Torrent Tyrannulet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chirripó National Park the best place to see a Torrent Tyrannulet?
6th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Torrent Tyrannulet sightings, Chirripó National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Los Quetzales National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%), Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%) and Volcán Barú National Park (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Torrent Tyrannulet live in Chirripó National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Torrent Tyrannulet that you can see in Chirripó National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 40%), Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet (about 40%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Torrent Tyrannulet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Torrent Tyrannulet is recorded against all the birds logged in Chirripó National Park (106 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.