What are the chances of seeing a MacGillivray's Warbler in San Luis Potosí?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a MacGillivray's Warbler sighting in San Luis Potosí on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 50th most-seen of the 62 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a MacGillivray's Warbler in San Luis Potosí?
April
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a MacGillivray's Warbler in San Luis Potosí on a given day, against under 5% in November and December, the lowest months. That is one of San Luis Potosí's driest months, with about 5 mm of rain against 110 mm in July. March and June–October have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a MacGillivray's Warbler?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most MacGillivray's Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is San Luis Potosí the best place to see a MacGillivray's Warbler?
Yes
Of the 28 cities where we can rate MacGillivray's Warbler sightings, San Luis Potosí has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Mexico City (México, about 10%) and Guadalajara (México, about 10%).
Which relatives of the MacGillivray's Warbler live in San Luis Potosí?
Same family: Parulidae
The closest relatives of the MacGillivray's Warbler that you can see in San Luis Potosí (family Parulidae, New World Warblers) are Yellow-rumped Warbler (about 40%), Audubon's Warbler (about 20%) and Wilson's Warbler (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the MacGillivray's Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the MacGillivray's Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in San Luis Potosí (6 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.