What are the chances of seeing an African Stonechat in De Hoop Nature Reserve?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an African Stonechat sighting in De Hoop Nature Reserve on a given day, based on 108 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 75th most-seen of the 189 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an African Stonechat in De Hoop Nature Reserve?
January
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report an African Stonechat in De Hoop Nature Reserve on a given day, against about 10% in May, August and December, the lowest months. June has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an African Stonechat?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most African Stonechat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is De Hoop Nature Reserve the best place to see an African Stonechat?
10th of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate African Stonechat sightings, De Hoop Nature Reserve ranks 10th at about 20%. The best odds are in Golden Gate Highlands National Park (South Africa, about 70%), Mantadia National Park (Madagascar, about 50%) and Arusha National Park (Tanzania, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the African Stonechat live in De Hoop Nature Reserve?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the African Stonechat that you can see in De Hoop Nature Reserve (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Cape Robin-Chat (about 60%), Capped Wheatear (about 60%) and Fiscal Flycatcher (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the African Stonechat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the African Stonechat is recorded against all the birds logged in De Hoop Nature Reserve (108 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.