What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-tailed Rock-Thrush in Doñana National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-tailed Rock-Thrush sighting in Doñana National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 231st most-seen of the 234 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-tailed Rock-Thrush in Doñana National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-tailed Rock-Thrush in Doñana National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-tailed Rock-Thrush?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-tailed Rock-Thrush sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Doñana National Park the best place to see a Rufous-tailed Rock-Thrush?
25th of 26
Of the 26 parks where we can rate Rufous-tailed Rock-Thrush sightings, Doñana National Park ranks 25th at under 5%. The best odds are in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park (Mongolia, about 30%), Tsavo West National Park (Kenya, about 20%) and Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park (Spain, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Rufous-tailed Rock-Thrush live in Doñana National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous-tailed Rock-Thrush that you can see in Doñana National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are European Stonechat (about 60%), Black Redstart (about 20%) and European Robin (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-tailed Rock-Thrush sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-tailed Rock-Thrush is recorded against all the birds logged in Doñana National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.