What are the chances of seeing a Black-headed Ibis in Gir National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-headed Ibis sighting in Gir National Park on a given day, based on 35 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 59th most-seen of the 135 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-headed Ibis in Gir National Park?
February
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Black-headed Ibis in Gir National Park on a given day, against about 10% in January and May–June, the lowest months. That is one of Gir National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 330 mm in July. July and August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Black-headed Ibis?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-headed Ibis sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Gir National Park the best place to see a Black-headed Ibis?
9th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Black-headed Ibis sightings, Gir National Park ranks 9th at about 20%. The best odds are in Keoladeo National Park (India, about 70%), Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 70%) and Kaziranga National Park (India, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black-headed Ibis live in Gir National Park?
Same family: Threskiornithidae
The closest relatives of the Black-headed Ibis that you can see in Gir National Park (family Threskiornithidae, Ibises and Spoonbills) are Red-naped Ibis (about 30%) and Glossy Ibis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-headed Ibis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-headed Ibis is recorded against all the birds logged in Gir National Park (35 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.