What are the chances of seeing a Violaceous Euphonia in Itatiaia National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Violaceous Euphonia sighting in Itatiaia National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 289th most-seen of the 352 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Violaceous Euphonia in Itatiaia National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Violaceous Euphonia in Itatiaia National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Violaceous Euphonia?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Violaceous Euphonia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Itatiaia National Park the best place to see a Violaceous Euphonia?
9th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Violaceous Euphonia sightings, Itatiaia National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 60%), Tijuca National Park (Brazil, about 50%) and Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Violaceous Euphonia live in Itatiaia National Park?
Same genus: Euphonia
The closest relatives of the Violaceous Euphonia that you can see in Itatiaia National Park (genus Euphonia, Typical Euphonias) are Chestnut-bellied Euphonia (about 30%) and Purple-throated Euphonia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Violaceous Euphonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Violaceous Euphonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Itatiaia National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.