What are the chances of seeing a Hooded Siskin in Itatiaia National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Hooded Siskin sighting in Itatiaia National Park on a given day, based on 378 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 105th most-seen of the 352 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hooded Siskin in Itatiaia National Park?
May and November
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Hooded Siskin in Itatiaia National Park on a given day, against about 10% in June to September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Hooded Siskin?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hooded Siskin sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Itatiaia National Park the best place to see a Hooded Siskin?
4th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Hooded Siskin sightings, Itatiaia National Park ranks 4th at about 20%. The best odds are in Lauca National Park (Chile, about 40%), Serra da Canastra National Park (Brazil, about 30%) and El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Hooded Siskin live in Itatiaia National Park?
Same family: Fringillidae
The closest relatives of the Hooded Siskin that you can see in Itatiaia National Park (family Fringillidae, Finches, Euphonias, and Allies) are Chestnut-bellied Euphonia (about 30%), Purple-throated Euphonia (about 10%) and Blue-naped Chlorophonia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hooded Siskin sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hooded Siskin is recorded against all the birds logged in Itatiaia National Park (378 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.