What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-tailed Starling in Kaziranga National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-tailed Starling sighting in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, based on 1,096 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 34th most-seen of the 323 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-tailed Starling in Kaziranga National Park?
February and April
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-tailed Starling in Kaziranga National Park on a given day, against about 30% in September, the lowest month. June and July have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-tailed Starling?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-tailed Starling sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kaziranga National Park the best place to see a Chestnut-tailed Starling?
Yes
Of the 23 parks where we can rate Chestnut-tailed Starling sightings, Kaziranga National Park has the highest daily chance: about 50%. Next come Manas National Park (India, about 40%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Chestnut-tailed Starling live in Kaziranga National Park?
Same family: Sturnidae
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-tailed Starling that you can see in Kaziranga National Park (family Sturnidae, Starlings) are Jungle Myna (about 70%), Indian Pied Starling (about 60%) and White-vented Myna (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-tailed Starling sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-tailed Starling is recorded against all the birds logged in Kaziranga National Park (1,096 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.