What are the chances of seeing a Collared Kingfisher in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Collared Kingfisher sighting in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, based on 113 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 72nd most-seen of the 203 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Collared Kingfisher in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
September
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Collared Kingfisher in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, the lowest month. January has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Collared Kingfisher?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Collared Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kerinci Seblat National Park the best place to see a Collared Kingfisher?
8th of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Collared Kingfisher sightings, Kerinci Seblat National Park ranks 8th at about 20%. The best odds are in Bali Barat National Park (Indonesia, about 80%), Sundarbans National Park (India, about 80%) and Komodo National Park (Indonesia, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Collared Kingfisher live in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Collared Kingfisher that you can see in Kerinci Seblat National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are White-throated Kingfisher (about 20%) and Banded Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Collared Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Collared Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Kerinci Seblat National Park (113 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.