What are the chances of seeing a MacGillivray's Warbler in Los Quetzales National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a MacGillivray's Warbler sighting in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 224th most-seen of the 252 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a MacGillivray's Warbler in Los Quetzales National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a MacGillivray's Warbler in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a MacGillivray's Warbler?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most MacGillivray's Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Los Quetzales National Park the best place to see a MacGillivray's Warbler?
34th of 36
Of the 36 parks where we can rate MacGillivray's Warbler sightings, Los Quetzales National Park ranks 34th at under 5%. The best odds are in Glacier National Park (United States, about 40%), Yosemite National Park (United States, about 30%) and Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (United States, about 30%).
Which relatives of the MacGillivray's Warbler live in Los Quetzales National Park?
Same family: Parulidae
The closest relatives of the MacGillivray's Warbler that you can see in Los Quetzales National Park (family Parulidae, New World Warblers) are Wilson's Warbler (about 50%), Collared Redstart (about 50%) and Flame-throated Warbler (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the MacGillivray's Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the MacGillivray's Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Los Quetzales National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.