What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-vented Conebill in Manu National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-vented Conebill sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 87 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 395th most-seen of the 641 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-vented Conebill in Manu National Park?
September
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-vented Conebill in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to August, the lowest months. That is one of Manu National Park's driest months, with about 90 mm of rain against 290 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-vented Conebill?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-vented Conebill sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Chestnut-vented Conebill?
8th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Chestnut-vented Conebill sightings, Manu National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%), Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut-vented Conebill live in Manu National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-vented Conebill that you can see in Manu National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Silver-beaked Tanager (about 50%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 40%) and Red-capped Cardinal (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-vented Conebill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-vented Conebill is recorded against all the birds logged in Manu National Park (87 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.