What are the chances of seeing a Blue Monarch in Murchison Falls National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Blue Monarch sighting in Murchison Falls National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 6th most-seen of the 14 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue Monarch in Murchison Falls National Park?
November
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Blue Monarch in Murchison Falls National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May, September–October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Blue Monarch?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue Monarch sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Murchison Falls National Park the best place to see a Blue Monarch?
8th of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Blue Monarch sightings, Murchison Falls National Park ranks 8th at about 20%. The best odds are in Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park (Mexico, about 40%), Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 20%) and Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (Guatemala, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Blue Monarch live in Murchison Falls National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Blue Monarch that you can see in Murchison Falls National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Dark Blue Pansy (about 30%), Plain Tiger Butterfly (about 20%) and Common Glider (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue Monarch sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue Monarch is recorded against all the insects logged in Murchison Falls National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.