What are the chances of seeing an Indian Pied Starling in Namdapha National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Indian Pied Starling sighting in Namdapha National Park on a given day, based on 43 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 185th most-seen of the 298 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Indian Pied Starling in Namdapha National Park?
January, April and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Indian Pied Starling in Namdapha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May and November–December, the lowest months. June to September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Indian Pied Starling?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Indian Pied Starling sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Namdapha National Park the best place to see an Indian Pied Starling?
13th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Indian Pied Starling sightings, Namdapha National Park ranks 13th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kaziranga National Park (India, about 60%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 60%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Indian Pied Starling live in Namdapha National Park?
Same family: Sturnidae
The closest relatives of the Indian Pied Starling that you can see in Namdapha National Park (family Sturnidae, Starlings) are Common Hill Myna (about 30%), Jungle Myna (about 10%) and Golden-crested Myna (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Indian Pied Starling sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Indian Pied Starling is recorded against all the birds logged in Namdapha National Park (43 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.