What are the chances of seeing an Azure Kingfisher in Noosa National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Azure Kingfisher sighting in Noosa National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 120th most-seen of the 128 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Azure Kingfisher in Noosa National Park?
March
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Azure Kingfisher in Noosa National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to February, the lowest months. That is one of Noosa National Park's wettest months, with about 170 mm of rain against 30 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see an Azure Kingfisher?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Azure Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Noosa National Park the best place to see an Azure Kingfisher?
9th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Azure Kingfisher sightings, Noosa National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Daintree National Park (Australia, about 60%), Kakadu National Park (Australia, about 30%) and Royal National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Azure Kingfisher live in Noosa National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Azure Kingfisher that you can see in Noosa National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are Laughing Kookaburra (about 40%) and Sacred Kingfisher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Azure Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Azure Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Noosa National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.