What are the chances of seeing a Savannah Sparrow in Olympic National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Savannah Sparrow sighting in Olympic National Park on a given day, based on 449 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 72nd most-seen of the 216 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Savannah Sparrow in Olympic National Park?
October
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Savannah Sparrow in Olympic National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–August and November–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Savannah Sparrow?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Savannah Sparrow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Olympic National Park the best place to see a Savannah Sparrow?
22nd of 47
Of the 47 parks where we can rate Savannah Sparrow sightings, Olympic National Park ranks 22nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Gros Morne National Park (Canada, about 50%), El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 40%) and Denali National Park (United States, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Savannah Sparrow live in Olympic National Park?
Same family: Passerellidae
The closest relatives of the Savannah Sparrow that you can see in Olympic National Park (family Passerellidae, New World Sparrows) are Dark-eyed Junco (about 60%), Song Sparrow (about 50%) and White-crowned Sparrow (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Savannah Sparrow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Savannah Sparrow is recorded against all the birds logged in Olympic National Park (449 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.