What are the chances of seeing a Coal Tit in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Coal Tit sighting in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park on a given day, based on 298 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 8th most-seen of the 105 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Coal Tit in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park?
January, March and July–November
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Coal Tit in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park on a given day, against about 30% in April, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Coal Tit?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Coal Tit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park the best place to see a Coal Tit?
11th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Coal Tit sightings, Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park ranks 11th at about 50%. The best odds are in Tatra National Park (Slovakia, about 70%), Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 70%) and Cairngorms National Park (United Kingdom, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Coal Tit live in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park?
Same family: Paridae
The closest relatives of the Coal Tit that you can see in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park (family Paridae, Tits, Chickadees, and Titmice) are Great Tit (about 50%), Blue Tit (about 40%) and Crested Tit (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Coal Tit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Coal Tit is recorded against all the birds logged in Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park (298 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.