What are the chances of seeing a Horned Lark in Redwood National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Horned Lark sighting in Redwood National Park on a given day, based on 27 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 164th most-seen of the 226 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Horned Lark in Redwood National Park?
November
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Horned Lark in Redwood National Park on a given day, against under 5% in December to October, the lowest months. That is one of Redwood National Park's wettest months, with about 290 mm of rain against almost none in July.
What time of day is best to see a Horned Lark?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Horned Lark sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Redwood National Park the best place to see a Horned Lark?
18th of 27
Of the 27 parks where we can rate Horned Lark sightings, Redwood National Park ranks 18th at under 5%. The best odds are in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park (Mongolia, about 70%), Badlands National Park (United States, about 50%) and Hemis National Park (India, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Horned Lark live in Redwood National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Horned Lark that you can see in Redwood National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Common Raven (about 70%), Steller's Jay (about 60%) and Song Sparrow (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Horned Lark sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Horned Lark is recorded against all the birds logged in Redwood National Park (27 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.