What are the chances of seeing a Coal Tit in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Coal Tit sighting in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, based on 2,045 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 16th most-seen of the 202 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Coal Tit in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
July and October
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Coal Tit in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, against about 30% in January, March and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Coal Tit?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Coal Tit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra de Guadarrama National Park the best place to see a Coal Tit?
12th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Coal Tit sightings, Sierra de Guadarrama National Park ranks 12th at about 40%. The best odds are in Tatra National Park (Slovakia, about 70%), Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 70%) and Cairngorms National Park (United Kingdom, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Coal Tit live in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Same family: Paridae
The closest relatives of the Coal Tit that you can see in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (family Paridae, Tits, Chickadees, and Titmice) are Great Tit (about 60%), Blue Tit (about 50%) and Crested Tit (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Coal Tit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Coal Tit is recorded against all the birds logged in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (2,045 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.