What are the chances of seeing a Broad-billed Motmot in Soberanía National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Broad-billed Motmot sighting in Soberanía National Park on a given day, based on 4,084 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 41st most-seen of the 449 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Broad-billed Motmot in Soberanía National Park?
October
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Broad-billed Motmot in Soberanía National Park on a given day, against about 20% in July, the lowest month. That is one of Soberanía National Park's wettest months, with about 330 mm of rain against 25 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Broad-billed Motmot?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Broad-billed Motmot sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Soberanía National Park the best place to see a Broad-billed Motmot?
Among the best
Of the 20 parks where we can rate Broad-billed Motmot sightings, Soberanía National Park ranks 2nd at about 40%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Broad-billed Motmot live in Soberanía National Park?
Same family: Momotidae
The closest relatives of the Broad-billed Motmot that you can see in Soberanía National Park (family Momotidae, Motmots) are Whooping Motmot (about 30%) and Rufous Motmot (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Broad-billed Motmot sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Broad-billed Motmot is recorded against all the birds logged in Soberanía National Park (4,084 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.