What are the chances of seeing an Azure Kingfisher in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Azure Kingfisher sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 40 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 91st most-seen of the 136 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Azure Kingfisher in Springbrook National Park?
February–April, June and August–December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Azure Kingfisher in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, May and July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Azure Kingfisher?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Azure Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see an Azure Kingfisher?
4th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Azure Kingfisher sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Daintree National Park (Australia, about 60%), Kakadu National Park (Australia, about 30%) and Royal National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Azure Kingfisher live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Azure Kingfisher that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are Laughing Kookaburra (about 60%) and Forest Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Azure Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Azure Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Springbrook National Park (40 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.