What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-vented Conebill in Tambopata National Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-vented Conebill sighting in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 497th most-seen of the 550 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-vented Conebill in Tambopata National Reserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-vented Conebill in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-vented Conebill?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-vented Conebill sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tambopata National Reserve the best place to see a Chestnut-vented Conebill?
13th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Chestnut-vented Conebill sightings, Tambopata National Reserve ranks 13th at under 5%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%), Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut-vented Conebill live in Tambopata National Reserve?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-vented Conebill that you can see in Tambopata National Reserve (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Silver-beaked Tanager (about 40%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 20%) and Palm Tanager (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-vented Conebill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-vented Conebill is recorded against all the birds logged in Tambopata National Reserve (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.