What are the chances of seeing a Lesser Masked-Weaver in Tarangire National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Masked-Weaver sighting in Tarangire National Park on a given day, based on 200 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 134th most-seen of the 411 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lesser Masked-Weaver in Tarangire National Park?
January, March–May, July and October–November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Masked-Weaver in Tarangire National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, June and September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Lesser Masked-Weaver?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lesser Masked-Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tarangire National Park the best place to see a Lesser Masked-Weaver?
13th of 42
Of the 42 parks where we can rate Lesser Masked-Weaver sightings, Tarangire National Park ranks 13th at about 10%. The best odds are in uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 30%), Lake Mburo National Park (Uganda, about 30%) and Waterberg Plateau Park (Namibia, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Lesser Masked-Weaver live in Tarangire National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Lesser Masked-Weaver that you can see in Tarangire National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Vitelline Masked-Weaver (about 10%), Black-necked Weaver (about 10%) and Chestnut Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lesser Masked-Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lesser Masked-Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Tarangire National Park (200 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.